From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: zsh-workers-return-43648-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9d7037fc for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 06:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3768 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2018 06:50:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 43648 Received: (qmail 3430 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Oct 2018 06:50:22 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.221.41):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.529252 secs); 09 Oct 2018 06:50:22 -0000 X-Envelope-From: stephane.chazelas@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=4Itj13KGAyfO3dsP3dqWAhVxxGLQwOiPJ51R7TelxIs=; b=rtG1y0WeAr8udUKbrxd/W8rZBPfhbOgzcu6Qir0jyoBbHOYSPqT+EP6wQZNkcu5JKJ JxaS3wTrGPNYJiYZWFSig/bOVBP91DAyJtScs8f0/AhVMYh7ODExOYYxLISEFAzEKHaX kqhKNWeu3iFIf2v9BHGvb0PRERjb3aaUAVn3gUYzx29KXpW6cww3uFVu1luRqRFialpC ZdDbjXdF5hWg9cFqArWA0EEtDtjTgjZH/gAwcysLGWLfxJOs3qIFrjsh9OL5aOxSBEkf enyvcSAoMp1JCdd9JXrUA9RiJ+3Cvk495a3Ngl4B6vBQQ+RnJtcSI71d4BYJXqEv8Thi hmtw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=4Itj13KGAyfO3dsP3dqWAhVxxGLQwOiPJ51R7TelxIs=; b=pqIstu/sis38YZaJr/poB8nB0l/rpKFlgaYabGfJ3GsHAEBt1u/8/LqAF8ohFQGLuE 2I7OOOkdx2eSjC0ZTGwQEmDt0aItg2MCOJLPWxX+6fs9rua/6DKoKBOFUFdPDAR/j0V1 EhFBnv0x3aMr8ceYgxii2lBQPiiO3HN+Ylsi5Xu/x14X1UONdAEUhbJ0Maroget7IUkf RlUFLmYlZC/vN6+hzLdaoWb10PuwPO8Lcs4kn206jBR80WcpM1D25P/JUZzgAgueSa2U 6/VQcXLiqkMuVUGUsDqq4TlSEOQ4N6r4Tha4QRjdr3bKsSHwpp/Tk7nBfftygXbg3mDC jYpg== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohrUtjo5eKZd/hvR8ms+Hl6RTgXBcsS22Y7GGcE1x/jU2iglYkc u/0BzBG7OVaILY+iWZdDL0u5xZGjbwU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV622bypapEYC0nBLpYdQB3ZruGWTb4gMCJXq08ongDWflYDKvMGb05wBjbEViFjNf988mmuB2A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d841:: with SMTP id k1-v6mr19245565wrl.26.1539067815807; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 23:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 07:50:14 +0100 From: Stephane Chazelas To: Zsh hackers list Subject: inconsistent long number truncation Message-ID: <20181009065014.6rxe67ophjq6j6vs@chaz.gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Zsh hackers list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 >From https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/474132 $ zsh -c 'echo $((12345678901234567890));echo $((12345678901234567890123))' zsh:1: number truncated after 19 digits: 12345678901234567890 1234567890123456789 zsh:1: number truncated after 22 digits: 12345678901234567890123 -1363962815083169260 I think the: newcalc = calc * base + *s - '0'; if (newcalc < calc) Is an invalid way to check for numbers wrapping. On GNU/Linux amd64 ulong 1234567890123456789*10 is 12345678901234567890 and: (gdb) p calc $7 = 12345678901234567890 (gdb) p calc*10 $8 = 12776324570088369204 (gdb) p calc*10*10 $9 = 17082781258626382344 (gdb) p calc*10*10*10 $10 = 4807115922877858896 Why do we truncate in the first place? That's hardly more useful than letting the numbers wrap. -- Stephane