From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 824097eb for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 22:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15590 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2018 22:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 43903 Received: (qmail 1586 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Dec 2018 22:00:59 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.100.2/25112. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(209.85.215.194):SA:0(1.7/5.0):. Processed in 1.329134 secs); 16 Dec 2018 22:00:59 -0000 X-Envelope-From: joeypabalinas@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |signature.asc| X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0YbA7pFAPAb+xWYfjMcMULd3Sl9eXomj/I4Sfn0NV4Q=; b=e0hBH5COqXDWBZn0amnODkFHZ08wQseNPBFEfbH5heegAyNTpq/KGOZC5nJ4wJ4Hk1 e3+aQ5F4GajLLG14hrgwEkdi/gn/AO7M4Egi9LwCHUEDFG7kgN4tVgagv0Ogdsu/ZIYS P30VM0feWTjKxTzafTv3DZykfP+ojeGONls4DMofyorbYau8Z3qWDUFUwILuaZtnTllb xa9W9HQFOKpV6TVB6m+hARxjaqhpbCZN7cRh6VAcP/1rJKHV86y0Lx0LyTupLVX4qIbk /An0u86tXN2a183NA4Y75NX7TCCg0rneKUmeYkOCN+oqw6KvEH0oMHV309x3RdP/lXFt AlAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0YbA7pFAPAb+xWYfjMcMULd3Sl9eXomj/I4Sfn0NV4Q=; b=sbL63/Aq5RFgAjtpUhU5LJA0O+AWwG+g5bXbZt97wIsSsZUpxpjnAW9A+oRgZnJ81u yR8QuSDQOSpaNPpFZk4nQTdPQWfqfyCyly9HaTvYXXzKYdZhcV8OuFhb5axulrXePRKJ 1gQKjC8h2CgOuwoI1Jg1QLFQ+b2MhoVakONe448ia9Wdh1sWBUbjDC/A3JRl2LE9dQZ5 NhzxygLvqkpRoY2eeSvgyFARIl2QjIw6lQNAIo5i3EfRmiwGuPdpgDWR1ipIZlaSen2g rAkboRU9Ipn8uFgwdI3L5qW3Y9akwrpgK2asi9rOqlR5nrKknDePE+IyrAO2C91vO+EF iE8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWac9vC49d8WoThsVP7QfI0k9Uz85Ufy3R7LezTSYriOlZ+xOckQ DIEMNa7bgnLXt/k8IpcXAXw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Uzg5Ji3Yf60Esvgbd01I64sD2bAzUZoSTgkLiH5FH334oXwFy8YU4xxvxogk5SK+nj66q0lg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:7504:: with SMTP id q4mr10416909pfc.180.1544997654532; Sun, 16 Dec 2018 14:00:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 12:00:51 -1000 From: Joey Pabalinas To: Bart Schaefer Cc: Joey Pabalinas , Daniel Shahaf , Zsh hackers list Subject: Re: [PATCH] zshmisc(1): document implicit append of `term` when `in word` is omitted Message-ID: <20181216220051.jv4x6577n7a72a4j@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joey Pabalinas , Bart Schaefer , Daniel Shahaf , Zsh hackers list References: <8afdae3ebc75741d47d657f29fb7d2876f9536b2.1544905398.git.joeypabalinas@gmail.com> <1544925190.621790.1610325216.065C6F48@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20181216020127.bdskejrh2ckxrg5n@gmail.com> <20181216115408.2bkygixkx7eymqvp@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <20181216191524.ejjtkuyoud2fzasg@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fwkegai3c5otnild" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 --fwkegai3c5otnild Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:41:12AM -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018, 11:15 AM Joey Pabalinas wrote: >=20 > > > > But again agreed, I'll wait for someone who knows the parser well (Bart > > maybe?) to chime in before I cook up a v2. > > >=20 > Refer to PWS's message on this thread. >=20 > I think in general the parser is the way it's intended to be, and unless > there's an actual, nontrivial bug or incompatibility with a standard, it > should be assumed that the doc is incomplete. Cool, thanks for clearing that up. I'll spin a v2 in a bit then. --=20 Cheers, Joey Pabalinas --fwkegai3c5otnild Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEENpTlWU2hUK/KMvHp2rGdfm9DtVIFAlwWyxIACgkQ2rGdfm9D tVKiEhAApAliOQJFBjOiCntyLfh1wXyCzc5wrpIJkVvCFpPRKhjbLSaEdswNq3sK +ijVugBtrqwkM4B1KGwon+uclQck2kciO9a/iJycLlPoahoEQ5xJ3HHmx3WFXSSx 2nbdteMl43XfubLlGK2pLUiaorNb5akKwYfL8eJEFzPStjCWXBEuA9foqzCzkyTf SsalPMT885updjEKg4ZCnS6pYMzkVu5LSXwfOWxSg0ZLh9enFI/SJiSXY8Uv/l5b zux5q3HGxQp6NDZ/ntAqtrpUz7yd+cBUZQXTo1sL+JyXATw2hfbv4OweFer1+i2I UMV/p+73Dn+6zLfibnCyoBF+GSTVfu6pnP/4chSzT2sHsdQYacCaKdRT7wwoqz87 q5ZLfu58pNBjLlbZCdjgPHdodKywKNdZakTAVLMpw7/4xR8MPihDTfZFTQmhZVnx 0jTUUcEnx7BuwSTrMlx0P4ywgXc/KpRFPgcLrTDKi2M0kRCbZWLlAV8ZgnuxCBO+ HXzBDCWfQyg+ExSP/1KAH7bBXqlo3I9W0Xi6McR5Tt8+a70kaKPEla/CDzzsGIDU 9MdxUn/AODyXYTIk6j0+JKavY9NEwUxfTz1ftni1ppoGVYCw28clbYQQJdnt3jcE WRM5xPxRPdSYP09K0r7J0QD3g3TnZyoCug1bDsdU/6J+aAWD+TE= =VOqa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fwkegai3c5otnild--