From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: glob qualifier '-' doesn't work correctly on dangling symlinks
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:02:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414120241.3d8d7246@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414061816.5qfbjyc6w3x34wcz@chazelas.org>
Stephane Chazelas wrote on Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:18 +0100:
> 2020-04-13 23:41:49 +0200, Vincent Lefevre:
> [...]
> > > Which one(s) should find -L . -type l (or find . -xtype l)
> > > print?
> >
> > /etc/passwd/foo
> > /etc/pesswd/foo
> > symloop/foo
> >
> > (and I would expect an error message for /root/foo, such as
> > "Permission denied", in addition to a non-zero exit status).
>
> So not that "unambiguous" after all. I could not find a single
> find implementation that agrees with your interpretation (not
> that it means that your intepretation is better or worse).
>
> GNU find for instance only prints /etc/pesswd/foo and
> /etc/passwd/foo (but outputs an error for the latter) and
> returns non-zero for anything but /etc/pesswd/foo.
>
> What should the outcome be for ESYS123 error code?
>
> To me, the best approach is zsh's where *(-@) reports *all*
> broken links, broken meaning "whose target cannot be resolved".
Counter-argument: since an ENOMEM during symlink resolution causes
«(-@)» to presume the symlink is broken, the zsh language is
non-deterministic: what «intact-symlink(N-@)» will expand to will
depend on whether there is enough memory at runtime.
Shouldn't an ENOMEM during expansion of «intact-symlink(N-@)» result in
an error? "In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess."
That is: I think there's a qualitative difference between ENOENT and ENOMEM.
I'm not sure what to do about unknown error codes.
Cheers,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-14 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-11 15:15 Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-11 17:34 ` Stephane Chazelas
2020-04-11 19:17 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-11 20:37 ` Stephane Chazelas
2020-04-11 23:48 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-12 1:21 ` Daniel Shahaf
2020-04-12 2:17 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-12 7:09 ` Stephane Chazelas
2020-04-12 14:25 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-12 17:34 ` Stephane Chazelas
2020-04-12 23:38 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-13 14:22 ` Stephane Chazelas
2020-04-13 15:00 ` Bart Schaefer
2020-04-13 21:41 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-14 6:18 ` Stephane Chazelas
2020-04-14 12:02 ` Daniel Shahaf [this message]
2020-04-14 12:38 ` Stephane Chazelas
2020-04-15 0:44 ` Daniel Shahaf
2020-04-15 9:17 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-14 17:59 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-12 12:48 ` Peter Stephenson
2020-04-12 14:31 ` Vincent Lefevre
2020-04-12 15:49 ` Peter Stephenson
2020-04-12 23:07 ` Vincent Lefevre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200414120241.3d8d7246@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2 \
--to=d.s@daniel.shahaf.name \
--cc=zsh-workers@zsh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).