From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 18530 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2022 08:43:33 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 7 Dec 2022 08:43:33 -0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; t=1670402613; b=iCFj9FuCRh4s12r3zC4F2l2/fSHAQPkmUrXQtG9fp+vrV+sDBkCZXo27Na8BCtSqyPA7HG5nFn isKQEYY7npDtDG8AYHIx7J7MDuODpns+I35LTnLrkjOSMUvTR3lEQL6NmNopvqRzWenvJWQ7W1 cOQWQxbZe/JCpY0qWsqBT7d5NwfX+UfaB/r46MMLWS0XvXpx16cq4Do+Wg2wvmGTA4cIknoZx0 cLbFQvYNHeAdM/xBLfVnlxV98lFVEpLBFE8HjKsbWZHgJJ50ZZyNRR3FCyXtl2XtU8s61400xb tyL8F2DWZJhpMkKmJ5IWqZ4B5jyZmTZqxvFmVSWb6tkT7A==; ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; zsh.org; iprev=pass (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net) smtp.remote-ip=217.70.183.194; dmarc=none header.from=chazelas.org; arc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; t=1670402613; bh=JK93xfCKMITLBbTshAKsrBQocggFoF0qdWUD1OH+wiU=; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Id:Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:DKIM-Signature; b=jJSSQyV8n28JCEpidD15q5vQhFA3oYtNdwSN8C4IuL5zMNgRHxu6KqQrMWcue6FB0KhcZqeAOF SzG7jbgS9+LxENegISrn2AaCWDawtkIMEpEh1d9EXn4fKmmDmZbmR03QfHi1KtKng7DkJ0yqQV WQikmrvI2Y6C+FnEDXN6e5uLIPuuZAByYXoEMH9zI+pmeRa/WppYOWWRr5OuE29hexQ9HAq7LT nVDuXYzBDuaSfqBgUpuEM3oj009OkNZ+A5Qz3bPtKLQ14kaYoMxldlMHRYWkUKi/Eccvo3gF/V kE99DJKYD37ZLTzIBgHGgA8AOZAX9ZXos/MCojxtbpwlGA==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=DX7MbTxoXCDVgLHtPfPnQO5ilXp10FUgqYkMcFOJTmM=; b=DDbcdam1GMpkjRbt7ckHHJmLky Mwa6CpsNxZ68E05Yvq/eFTtUHgtg5MLM69GrLqvPo+M4RAB9wwZWNtvW3ITd9J3jdrN2zGNOoIAO/ 6tZhPCo46h0jI2Rd4xCCBGXnKcoYzi9kqNw3+XbUPleGAy+FuHTZ0kocp/Gr/QwHNW+n7ug1I+H4L Gsd2YzV75Xoay2ep24GNpT6h06ELcJuBDuBAhTbt+alnTuERHAMl80hyRGdRCYQTVh9cvjI7mAJvf ZRNEbt4Ul2zzXGQ8vexuqEkqYqv77Qr2iAH/FVRMTBk+CjOrbuambRN96GSRF6LBbI0WLw4cQFubn 2t57WF1Q==; Received: by zero.zsh.org with local id 1p2q1c-000Afu-Rm; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 08:43:32 +0000 Authentication-Results: zsh.org; iprev=pass (relay2-d.mail.gandi.net) smtp.remote-ip=217.70.183.194; dmarc=none header.from=chazelas.org; arc=none Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:61333) by zero.zsh.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1p2q13-000ALr-P6; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 08:42:58 +0000 Received: (Authenticated sender: stephane@chazelas.org) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 678BF40007; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 08:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 08:42:55 +0000 From: Stephane Chazelas To: Michael Greenberg Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: `return` does not behave properly under `!` Message-ID: <20221207084255.ykkg6cgzn4nqc73f@chazelas.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Greenberg , zsh-workers@zsh.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Seq: 51110 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: 2022-12-06 13:18:59 -0500, Michael Greenberg: [...] > i() { > ! return 9 > echo fail not > } > i > echo $? > ``` [...] > 0 [...] That: ! return n Behaves like return !n (and ! return behave like return !$? (or return "$(( ! $? ))" in POSIX syntax) doesn't sound totally off to me. As written, I would say the POSIX spec may even be requiring it. That's consistent with ! break causing the while/until loop it's in returning with failure which I've seen code rely upon (AFAIK, that's the only way to get those loops to return with failure; doesn't work in pdksh and derivatives though). -- Stephane