From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id DAA25518 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 03:07:14 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA05329; Fri, 21 Jun 1996 13:00:04 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 13:00:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Zefram Message-Id: <21470.199606211659@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: Re: zsh.texi commentary (actually, HTML pages commentary) To: schaefer@nbn.com Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 17:59:03 +0100 (BST) Cc: A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk, hzoli@cs.elte.hu, clive@epos.demon.co.uk, mdb@cdc.noaa.gov, zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <960621085558.ZM4927@candle.brasslantern.com> from "Bart Schaefer" at Jun 21, 96 08:55:54 am X-Loop: zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk X-Stardate: [-31]7693.53 X-US-Congress: Moronic fuckers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"SKTZT3.0.6J1.JKjon"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1417 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu >} That patch isn't in the baseline yet. It made the canonical form of >} that option NOMATCH, so that "setopt NOMATCH", "unsetopt NOMATCH", >} "setopt NO_NOMATCH" and "unsetopt NO_NOMATCH" are valid. > >So you check for canonical forms before stripping off the leading "no", >and then check again after stripping it to invert the sense? Or what? Yes. I considered having it check for leading "no" first, but with options NOTIFY and NOMATCH that wouldn't work. >} Also these are builins now, which is not yet documented. > >Exactly what difference does that make? (Which is part of what ought to >be documented ...) That affects "disable exec"/"disable -r exec", and "x=ex; ${x}ec foo". -zefram