From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RDNS_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.2
Received: (qmail 28920 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2020 16:17:33 -0000
Received-SPF:  pass (primenet.com.au: domain of zsh.org
  designates 203.24.36.2 as permitted sender)
  receiver=inbox.vuxu.org; client-ip=203.24.36.2
  envelope-from=<zsh-workers-return-45645-ml=inbox.vuxu.org@zsh.org>
Received: from unknown (HELO primenet.com.au) (203.24.36.2)
  by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2020 16:17:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 4092 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2020 16:17:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 45645
Received: (qmail 17678 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Mar 2020 16:17:02 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from know-smtprelay-omc-8.server.virginmedia.net by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.102.2/25758. spamassassin: 3.4.2.  
 Clear:RC:0(80.0.253.72):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. 
 Processed in 3.333135 secs); 28 Mar 2020 16:17:02 -0000
X-Envelope-From: p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _smtprelay.virginmedia.com designates 80.0.253.72 as permitted sender)
X-Originating-IP: [86.16.88.158]
X-Authenticated-User: p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.3 cv=br5i+nSi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MiHCjVqLJ44lE3bxSlffFQ==:117
 a=MiHCjVqLJ44lE3bxSlffFQ==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19
 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=RB50JDc-HHs-OD4WmAYA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Message-ID: <2201b40f6fa12f35742262c572750af47516754f.camel@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: :P test failure
From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@ntlworld.com>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 16:16:21 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20200326222120.4832e6ad@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
References: <b8c58b13375dd10cc5c39a2fda20d51b090880c0.camel@ntlworld.com>
	 <20200326222120.4832e6ad@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEgfSi16uVbM6XhDZcS0WWTiAxG2BE2v+DFpQs8PW4GAUmutDexjighEKzRZzDTjPL0NcSDJQGFpTNjLiYnGxvB8vRZsf+KQcI46A+Al2/kfu6+BPnU2
 BevpWw/UGxujVZ1lzryMdxCRRE7rnEYJCwqtpYX/fEGdQPAIktxjFXVf

On Thu, 2020-03-26 at 22:21 +0000, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Peter Stephenson wrote on Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:27 +0000:
> > This doesn't work on my machine:
> > 
> >  # This is a bit brittle as it depends on PATH_MAX.
> >  # We could use sysconf..
> >  bad_pwd="/${(l:16000:: :):-}"
> >  print ${bad_pwd:P} | wc -c
> > 0:modifier ':P' with path too long
> > > 16002  
> > 
> > The modification fails with error and output
> > 
> > zsh: path expansion failed, using root directory
> > 2
> 
> The behaviour you see is exactly what the test's _expected_ output was
> before 45583/0004.  Is there any chance that you ran HEAD's tests on an
> old zsh binary by accident?

Yes, rebuilding does indeed fix it.  Somehow I managed to get it built
with my patch in but not yours --- probably the result of a merge.

Cheers
pws