From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: zsh-workers-request@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA02617 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 02:04:56 +1100 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA22976; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:57:26 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 09:57:26 -0500 (EST) From: Zefram Message-Id: <22303.199611141457@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: Re: zle_refresh trial patch (and unrelated bug) To: pws@ifh.de (Peter Stephenson) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 14:57:15 +0000 (GMT) Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <199611140903.KAA16132@hydra.ifh.de> from "Peter Stephenson" at Nov 14, 96 10:03:34 am X-Loop: zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk X-Stardate: [-31]8423.11 X-US-Congress: Moronic fuckers Content-Type: text Resent-Message-ID: <"BSq4e2.0.tc5.LDpYo"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2408 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu > Anything more >sophisticated probably needs (( to have it's own type flag in struct >Cmd. I for one would like that to happen. It's really annoying to have (()) changed to let when listing functions. It's also confusing to have (()) fail after "disable let". >(Sorrysorry... it's against 3.1 again. I don't have the luxury here >of space for arbitrary versions. I really don't think that will make >a difference this time.) It only really makes a difference when patching the module code itself. IMO we shouldn't be posting patches for `configure' itself anyway; they are large and contain no information. (zsh developers can be assumed to have autoconf available.) -zefram