From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA02046 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 1996 04:20:46 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA23901; Thu, 15 Aug 1996 14:18:46 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 14:18:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Zefram Message-Id: <22661.199608151817@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: Re: bug in zsh-3.0.0 configuration :-) To: hzoli@cs.elte.hu (Zoltan Hidvegi) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 19:17:24 +0100 (BST) Cc: A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk, zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <199608151814.UAA17856@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> from "Zoltan Hidvegi" at Aug 15, 96 08:14:38 pm X-Loop: zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk X-Stardate: [-31]7968.81 X-US-Congress: Moronic fuckers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"rucJ92.0.Lr5.5es4o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1992 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu >I left this check there because it may be useful later. It does not use the >cache because it is fast enough. I know that the cache can also be used to >override the detected default but since it is not used it will not be a >problem now. Fine. I can see it being a little confusing, that's all. Am I right in thinking that I have the first zsh-3.0 installation outside Hungary here? -zefram