From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-25981-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 16723 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2008 09:45:09 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 31 Oct 2008 09:45:09 -0000
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: (qmail 29178 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2008 09:45:03 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 31 Oct 2008 09:45:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 23051 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2008 09:44:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 25981
Received: (qmail 23037 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2008 09:44:58 -0000
Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106)
  by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 31 Oct 2008 09:44:58 -0000
Received: from n28.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n28.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.145])
	by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36B6280524C0
	for <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:44:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.12.4.215] by n28.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2008 09:44:54 -0000
Received: from [87.248.111.144] by t2.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2008 09:44:54 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp201.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2008 09:44:54 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 386303.25150.bm@omp201.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 10105 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2008 09:44:54 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk;
  h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Received:In-reply-to:From:References:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID;
  b=0fNJkDeB7DDmhxCKbWtTtqHHDJwF7VBfFB+uqqZA1W35G9uxTgsziv+pnUn5a0GebfMLS/BpysBfbi7wofS5zDZyZX3j2DNslh++Mzmsoi9ao1nZ+IPNCEVDfUQrgmBfCaDwjSIbIISq3IwU21njWASUxc/Rdr+Zsbx8RPiBB4g=  ;
Received: from unknown (HELO thecus) (okiddle@89.60.243.114 with plain)
  by smtp120.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2008 09:44:53 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: zxRkCSgVM1n61Pcv6NxbKayGUCMZe8aA7aleBcdf40uVhmoSyh2Sf9kdK7IMp47tYmCrHmEPSe76yfITv1twZ_JzjxViOo_l6p_OYikL5UjQy.7DwyPiJgn1xrizoqEKw3b9vgO.eYhqwzffg2KZ1B4cvCBZF2MMvat6QRg-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=thecus)
	by thecus with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>)
	id 1KvqYm-0005uA-K6
	for zsh-workers@sunsite.dk; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:44:52 +0100
In-reply-to: <200810302213.m9UMD2Mi012011@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
From: Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <200810302213.m9UMD2Mi012011@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
To: "Zsh workers" <zsh-workers@sunsite.dk>
Subject: Re: another bug: zsh_directory_name
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:44:52 +0100
Message-ID: <22701.1225446292@thecus>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/8547/Fri Oct 31 10:27:15 2008 on bifrost
X-Virus-Status: Clean

Peter Stephenson wrote:
> so the problem is that the max function depth is too large on those
> systems (or, equivalently, the resource limits are too small).

Probably so but it should be noted that I get the seg fault on systems
with 4.3.9 where older versions of zsh print the "maximum nested function
level reached" message. Has some change meant that more stack space is
being used than before when calling functions recursively?

Oliver