From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA05935 for <mason@werple.mira.net.au>; Thu, 23 May 1996 07:31:23 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA12427; Wed, 22 May 1996 17:17:36 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 17:17:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Zefram <A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <23258.199605222117@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: BOURNE_SHELL_GLOB option
To: hzoli@cs.elte.hu (Zoltan Hidvegi)
Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 22:17:11 +0100 (BST)
Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
In-Reply-To: <199605222058.WAA31677@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> from "Zoltan Hidvegi" at May 22, 96 10:58:49 pm
X-Loop: zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk
X-Stardate: [-31]7544.43
X-US-Congress: Moronic fuckers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-ID: <"j-Wa22.0.223.hHuen"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/1138
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu

>Here is the option I suggested.  I called it BOURNE_SHELL_GLOB.

Wouldn't SH_GLOB be a better name, matching the existing
SH_WORD_SPLIT?  The option seems useful.

-zefram