From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4538 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 17:02:26 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 17:02:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 9234 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2004 17:02:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 19342 Received: (qmail 9156 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2004 17:02:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 17:02:19 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [202.214.225.228] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 6 Jan 2004 17:2:18 -0000 Received: from exchangejp.csr.com (unverified) by mailsweeperjp.CSR.COM (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.1) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 02:03:52 +0900 Received: from EXCHANGE02.csr.com ([192.168.137.45]) by exchangejp.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:04:12 +0000 Received: from csr.com ([192.168.144.127]) by EXCHANGE02.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:03:59 +0000 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: PATCH: remove support for autoconf before 2.50 In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Tue, 06 Jan 2004 16:11:22 GMT." <1040106161122.ZM1627@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:02:03 +0000 Message-ID: <23542.1073408523@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2004 17:03:59.0883 (UTC) FILETIME=[1408E5B0:01C3D477] Bart Schaefer wrote: > } -AC_OUTPUT_COMMANDS(,[if test -z "\$CONFIG_FILES\$CONFIG_HEADERS"; then > } -`cat ./${CONFIG_MODULES}.sh && rm -f ./${CONFIG_MODULES}.sh` > } -fi]) > > IIRC those lines are there so that the commands in ./${CONFIG_MODULES}.sh > get re-run when config.status is run. That was not *intended* as a fix > only for autoconf 2.13; why is it not needed in 2.50? I'm now more confused by Andrej's message. I thought he was saying that a test wasn't needed for 2.50, but it looks like he was actually saying we need a test anyway, and it's not available in 2.50. In that case, we can't get rid of the lines but it still won't always work. (The subtext is `whoever understands this, please fix it'.) -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. **********************************************************************