From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from zero.zsh.org (zero.zsh.org [IPv6:2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0284725E73 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 00:06:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Message-ID:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:To: References:From:In-reply-to:cc:Reply-To:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=TkwowF+SrE/SiZvPc1FFX9pmzrkJuSJeDBWMnindWu0=; b=mAb4FFSSlCUxMo2hR0zkUOgE3L RCIiqTKlRVhV/Pbn+QMDqvnFrc0ii1p48LEUWYmJsdu4Icy741DU0HbNoIBpyk/bXN6yfUto2i5nK e1ZMK9VDF8hT2j7rV38yop2POSrsnEhCKPduk/HtN5DkX9SsA6YjOiV+U8K4ZOuouu+IsKvpScvKs WLvVPGkgJGo9EFdc1k5PdBZgt0XUoau/iRWem1uf0FmObOVwsSrimUZW6Zl3si5A46Fev9KztPCUn ce6IVN/TSCS9D2ozmU7iJn3pMw08NtcDC+yFEzwsLaUVZicg+Qu/p+yzY2R8sozym8J1SFvNPVqvp bnoNVRRA==; Received: by zero.zsh.org with local id 1rdecU-0000PQ-BO; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:06:18 +0000 Received: by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1rdecE-000079-SF; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 23:06:03 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.21] (helo=hydra) by mail.kiddle.eu with esmtp(Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdecD-000000006vI-2vvX; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 00:06:01 +0100 cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org In-reply-to: <63c9623a-8424-4458-9137-99a249511518@app.fastmail.com> From: Oliver Kiddle References: <63c9623a-8424-4458-9137-99a249511518@app.fastmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= Subject: Re: Are the mailing lists still nested? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <26614.1708729561.1@hydra> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 00:06:01 +0100 Message-ID: <26615-1708729561.695851@uojh.XQpv.9iR-> X-Seq: 52586 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > The mailing list pages [1][2] state that the lists are nested, as > they were before the transition to sympa. Accordingly, I unsubscribed > from zsh-users and zsh-announce either yesterday or the day before, > thinking that I'd been receiving duplicate messages that my mail > provider was deduplicating. (No, I didn't actually verify that > this was happening. Mea culpa.) However, I just found out that I > never received the most recent message to zsh-users [3]. > > So: are the lists still nested? If not, are they supposed to be? > If not, the webpage needs updating. Yes, they're still nested. And you're listed in the subscriber list for all three with the source defined as "include_list zsh-workers". I think there was a way to tell it not to send you the -users messages from the web interface but I can't remember how. Oliver