From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10654 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 14:36:16 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 14:36:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 1575 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2003 14:36:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18260 Received: (qmail 1568 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 14:36:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 14:36:05 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [193.109.254.147] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 14:36:4 -0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: kiddleo@logica.com X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com!1045578825!3363 Received: (qmail 15578 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2003 14:33:46 -0000 Received: from iris.logica.co.uk (158.234.9.163) by server-15.tower-27.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2003 14:33:45 -0000 Received: from finches.logica.co.uk ([158.234.142.11]) by iris.logica.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id OAA12910; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:36:05 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: iris.logica.co.uk: Host [158.234.142.11] claimed to be finches.logica.co.uk Received: from finches.logica.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by finches.logica.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id h1IEddg02788; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:39:39 +0100 cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk In-reply-to: <20030218134534.GC17147@localhost.localdomain> From: Oliver Kiddle References: <20030218061442.GA17147@localhost.localdomain> <1583.1045564500@finches.logica.co.uk> <20030218134534.GC17147@localhost.localdomain> To: Doug Kearns Subject: Re: PATCH: xmllint completion Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:39:39 +0100 Message-ID: <2786.1045579179@finches.logica.co.uk> Sender: kiddleo@logica.com On 19 Feb, you wrote: > > Thanks, I've added this. We should perhaps clump it together with > > _xsltproc in an _xmlsoft (any views?). An xmlcatalog completion if/when > > written could go in there too. > > This sounds like a good idea to me. Okay, I'll do that then. > Maybe _webbrowser should be made a 'Type' and named something a little > more general? Perhaps. I'd probably have left it as _urls -f but you need separate functions for nested tag loops to work so it seemed the easiest solution. Trouble is that _webbrowser is for the most part just used for a bunch of web browsers, renaming might break someone's own function and I can't think of a better name (anyone?). Oliver This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.