From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11634 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2005 13:08:16 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Jun 2005 13:08:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 89124 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2005 13:08:09 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Jun 2005 13:08:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 7117 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2005 13:08:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 21319 Received: (qmail 7101 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2005 13:08:06 -0000 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Jun 2005 13:08:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 88722 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2005 13:08:06 -0000 Received: from mailhost1.csr.com (HELO MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com) (81.105.217.43) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 9 Jun 2005 13:08:00 -0000 Received: from exchange03.csr.com (unverified [10.100.137.60]) by MAILSWEEPER01.csr.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:06:03 +0100 Received: from csr.com ([10.102.144.127]) by exchange03.csr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:08:13 +0100 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: ctags tag completion In-reply-to: <20050609123908.GC4606@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050608040000.GF16824@localhost.localdomain> <20050609123908.GC4606@localhost.localdomain> Comments: In-reply-to Doug Kearns message dated "Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:39:08 +1000." Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 14:07:55 +0100 Message-ID: <27926.1118322475@csr.com> From: Peter Stephenson X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2005 13:08:13.0243 (UTC) FILETIME=[4AC8F0B0:01C56CF4] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a.mx.sunsite.dk X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=6.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Hits: -2.6 Doug Kearns wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 02:00:00PM +1000, Doug Kearns wrote: > > This adds completion for ctags tags which will also be useful for vi(m) > > completion when I get around to tidying it up. > > Should this be called _ctags_tags, or something else, given that someone > might want to write Command/_ctags to complete the ctags command itself? Yes, that would make sense. By the way, when I had a completion for etags a while ago, I made it search back up the directory tree for a TAGS file, since I tend to tag everything in a project in a single file. That might be a useful enhancement. -- Peter Stephenson Software Engineer CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070 ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. **********************************************************************