From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22181 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2015 14:33:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 34913 Received: (qmail 29694 invoked from network); 17 Apr 2015 14:33:02 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 From: Kamil Dudka To: Daniel Shahaf Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] report bad ELF interpreter if it causes exec to fail Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 16:32:54 +0200 Message-ID: <2847668.st8QIvm6zU@kdudka.brq.redhat.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.6 (Linux/3.19.1-201.fc21.x86_64; KDE/4.14.6; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150417134957.GB2426@tarsus.local2> References: <1429277155-24607-1-git-send-email-kdudka@redhat.com> <20150417134957.GB2426@tarsus.local2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 On Friday 17 April 2015 13:49:57 Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Kamil Dudka wrote on Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 15:25:54 +0200: > > +/* The following code is taken from . > > */ +#ifdef HAVE_ELF_H > > +static int > > +checkelfinterp(const char *pth, int fd, const char *sample, int > > sample_len) > Is this code available under a license compatible with zsh's license? > > The bug report doesn't state a license explicitly, so I presume any code > on the bug report is GPLed unless stated otherwise. > > Sorry to be license nanny. > > Cheers, > > Daniel Good point. I have asked the original author about this privately... Kamil