From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27350 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2010 17:03:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27576 Received: (qmail 16407 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2010 17:03:41 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.219.220 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7zZkhnR5T19xJjzWMhtZrFicTG4w1B761xOJvawl7Ak=; b=swIihFmdTQ/l9E3VmP3y//CzO7Wsixdsha3KnBdpym/5g2Q/9iYS7iy1ez8nabb8o/ /rd3cbQ8sfsvbGu2AUhYyi9surUFgBYjqevAirngXZ94d2mFFbhXFiWP1XOieDGI/dzR 6E+79fBVRSkiUEq4bthkjkUpG4cxEriPC0rCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tPEveEoC/Cmsy5u8iLCXCjvkwbqBXeMrq8LLkhB3WHKP6TU2K/biI8f6WEDo3CXEW/ 0V9Vtosh9uWxZSIUtOl2QwBm220/pYqFsUxnpnojM5TYh/RtOjtM3roLmXMuz6VxZrb+ Abw+Fy+8rU8gXrs5lXefB3NHeuaPVJ6g/zk7Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <237967ef1001060602q7b95e74dq332464de6ce3f34b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1262655497-21263-1-git-send-email-michael.a.hwang@gmail.com> <20100105094829.613883ab@news01> <237967ef1001060602q7b95e74dq332464de6ce3f34b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:03:34 +0100 Message-ID: <2d460de71001060903p598ffe51p7e2d4a0e8009d9b7@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removed arbitrary limitations on array accesses From: Richard Hartmann To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 15:02, Mikael Magnusson wrote: > 2010/1/6 Duncan Sinclair : >> % 99999999999 >> >> I reported this as a bug =E2=80=93 the shell should not crash so easily. > > There are other similar ways you can crash a shell anyway, > alt-111111111111 1 and `yes` for example. I'm not sure if it's worth > trying to fix all of them. Completing on arbitrary input is a lot more likely than your example, though. Richard