From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9227 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2000 16:57:23 -0000 Received: from sunsite.auc.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Mar 2000 16:57:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 6783 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2000 16:57:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 10065 Received: (qmail 6770 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2000 16:57:12 -0000 Message-ID: <38C9295A.DF12EAEC@u.genie.co.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 16:56:58 +0000 From: Oliver Kiddle X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Spiers CC: zsh workers mailing list Subject: Re: move to sourceforge.net? References: <20000310163259.A2867@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Adam Spiers wrote: > I've just registered a new account at sourceforge.net and had a peek > around. It all looks very tasty, and seems to me to be the ideal > place to relocate the CVS repository. Since I'm totally out of sync > with patches at the moment, but have a bit of free time for once, I'd > like to help get this going quickly. Are there any objections to this > move, and if not, would I be helping or just getting in the way by > registering zsh as a project on sourceforge? I'd vote in favour of going ahead with this. Sourceforge probably has a better chance of remaining around compared to any of our own machines we might run a public CVS on. I had a look around their site earlier this week and also concluded that it seems quite good. We could also look into using their bug-tracking system. Who is currently in charge of maintaining the web pages? They don't seem to have been updated since last summer and the news page doesn't even mention the 3.0.7 release. I'd be happy to take over doing the web pages if everyone's happy with that and if they aren't being done by anyone else. Oliver Kiddle