From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1454 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 19:47:12 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 May 2001 19:47:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 6072 invoked by alias); 29 May 2001 18:05:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 14546 Received: (qmail 5955 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 18:05:25 -0000 X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) Message-ID: <3B13E52D.5050308@mow.siemens.ru> Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 22:06:37 +0400 From: Andrej Borsenkow User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-6mdk i686; en-US; rv:0.9) Gecko/20010521 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bart Schaefer , ZSH Workers Mailing List Subject: Re: termcap bug on Linux References: <3B10FCA4.2000009@mow.siemens.ru> <1010528222527.ZM7246@candle.brasslantern.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bart Schaefer wrote: > On May 27, 5:09pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: > } Subject: termcap bug on Linux > } > } Mandrake cooker (currently glibc-2.2.3, termcap-11.0.1-4mdk) compiled > } with termcap, no ncurses. tgetflag() returns 0 for both unset and > } nonexsiting flags, which means that $termcap[cap] returns "no" for > } almost everything except numeric capabilities. > > Does the following patch help? This duplicates code from echotc() into > gettermcap() -- so the two should at least now agree with each other, > which they might not have before, even if they're both wrong. > Yes. > Does something similar need to go into scantermcap() ? > I guess, no. In scantermcap() we know type of each capability. -andrej