From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-43322-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 14015 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2018 03:24:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 43322
Received: (qmail 27131 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Aug 2018 03:24:51 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from rcpt-expgw.biglobe.ne.jp by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>, uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 
 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1.  
 Clear:RC:0(133.208.98.3):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. 
 Processed in 1.471173 secs); 21 Aug 2018 03:24:51 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
X-Envelope-From: takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: |
X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: |
X-Biglobe-Sender: <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
From: Jun T <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: bug report about zsh
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:24:47 +0900
References: <CAJbOvNxbshEc=YMe5BKUYfM7k3BGfWh=z8Jw7Acw5GnWRuTw_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <F96F21D1-EB8D-44C1-B7F2-B57B883ADB4A@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
 <CAH+w=7ZUJs+r3NOqysEvjm2bq-B2XK6mai_Zs7eRJMa3aA-gdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
In-Reply-To: <CAH+w=7ZUJs+r3NOqysEvjm2bq-B2XK6mai_Zs7eRJMa3aA-gdw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3C1D9C2A-8B6D-4845-A8AD-584FB53BB434@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-Biglobe-Spnum: 57447


> 2018/08/21 2:30, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, 10:21 AM Jun T. <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> wrote:
> 
>> Do we need to fix this? If so, then how? Can we just remove
>> the ':' from the pattern [:@] ?
>> 
> The colon is there so you can specify a port number, I think.

User *can* specify a port number but it is just ignored.

In _user_at_host, _combination is called with style 'users-hosts', not
'users-hosts-ports'. For example,

% zstyle ':completion:*' users-hosts 'foo@host.com:123'

% sshfs f<TAB><TAB>
% finger f<TAB><TAB>
% dsh -m f<TAB><TAB>

all of these complete to foo@host.com and the 123 will never be offered.
So I wonder why : is in the pattern [:@]. Is it just to ignore the
port number (if it exists)?