From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-17540-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 7656 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 18:42:56 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 13 Aug 2002 18:42:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 2403 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2002 18:42:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 17540
Received: (qmail 2387 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2002 18:42:42 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:50:31 +0200
Organization: Pleyades
To: schaefer@brasslantern.com, zsh-workers@sunsite.dk, raul@pleyades.net
Subject: Re: About menu selection (again)
Message-ID: <3D5954F7.mail1L21A9GN@viadomus.com>
References: <3D56CD6E.mailMX1LBVZ3@viadomus.com>
 <1020812060148.ZM28748@candle.brasslantern.com>
 <3D5906BF.mail17S21TJ8M@viadomus.com>
 <1020813150050.ZM30758@candle.brasslantern.com>
In-Reply-To: <1020813150050.ZM30758@candle.brasslantern.com>
User-Agent: nail 9.31 6/18/02
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: DervishD <raul@pleyades.net>
Reply-To: DervishD <raul@pleyades.net>
Sender: DervishD <raul@pleyades.net>
X-Mailer: DervishD TWiSTiNG Mailer

    Hi Bart :)

>}     It works because compctl is loaded!. I don't know how it gets
>} loaded, but it is :????
>Normally zsh/zle and zsh/compctl are both loaded as soon as zsh is ready
>to print the prompt.

    Well, when my login zsh starts, the only modules that are loaded
are zsh/zle and zsh/main. zsh/compctl is not there. Maybe I'm not
invoking any builtin in my rc's so compctl is autoloaded :??

>messed-up module_path, but
>that can't be it because you've said you're using a static link.

    Yes, they are statically linked. I'm having an idea... What if I
configured compctl prior to compilation as being statically linked
but NOT autoloaded (I mean, with load=no in the .mdd file)? I don't
have the mdd that I used for compilation, I'm afraid :((( But this
can be the problem, true?

>}     Well, the fact is that if I load compctl and after that complist,
>} all works OK, so I'm happy with this. Why I must load compctl is just
>} curiosity ;))
>If you're willing to look at it that way, OK.  Me, I'd be worried that it
>means something else is broken, too.

    Yes, you are right, because if something is wrong, then other
fails will arise sooner or later... Just that I have bigger problems
than that ;))) Fortunately zsh works fine always ;))

    Thanks for your help again, Bart.

    Raśl