From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9050 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2023 09:01:14 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Apr 2023 09:01:14 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Message-ID:Date:Content-ID: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From:In-reply-to:cc:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=KD0HFyKguSdC+HR50xi+8PMdsPzZmGswAh36TzxCFgc=; b=QlDsCuNaTA1naCOju/V8TUIe6K ysK5VJHFN/cyMb/UdGpTVALZD40SGX2125rJVTm+/7laeAV+ojD0rUUu9N7vgtoFNXUst9aJCcyg4 VSFRlcApwkaB/5lC/R/FPC5zB4uCrfyNGz22+YzbYOCFKHPzGFCWKDBWcAhE5KTi2Zl0R8a+HXgGd 7ChYMs/nj3UjmHjjiYF6HjphqrxmfUlkjtS6uBUHorPkH1MXnS4tHmoKC07D9M+QnslHyAHuVqKk5 ztSY7YEgS0uCsQsf2hCF82eZbysq+/P762KhknsbUfIDL/PMe6GiwLwfONJzdHTXirtyFxdsvVjrH H2czPIEg==; Received: by zero.zsh.org with local id 1pjz10-000F7s-0c; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 09:01:14 +0000 Received: by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1pjz0K-000Enk-RD; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 09:00:33 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.21] (helo=hydra) by mail.kiddle.eu with esmtp(Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1pjz0E-000B05-6x; Wed, 05 Apr 2023 11:00:28 +0200 cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org, "Jun. T" In-reply-to: From: Oliver Kiddle References: <2A0716F2-F80B-4357-87AA-0A9881A52CEC@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <24885-1680656615.101426@YPd-.5KmN.pkOW> To: zeurkous@blaatscaahp.org Subject: Re: ksh compatibility: initial value of $_ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <42287.1680685225.1@hydra> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2023 11:00:25 +0200 Message-ID: <42288-1680685225.572344@v4es.ZcbR.Aw81> X-Seq: 51629 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: zeurkous@blaatscaahp.org wrote: > FWIW, OpenBSD test(1) says-- > > --LL _f_i_l_e > True if _f_i_l_e exists and is a symbolic link. This operator is for > compatibility purposes. Do not rely on its existence; use --hh > instead. > > Note that last part. Is "-L" actually more standard? (Even on other > *cough* Unices, me's always used "-h"). Any system I have access to appears to support both. The other BSD's also have the same recommendation and on that basis, you're probably right that we should use -h. Oliver