From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17472 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2008 13:10:07 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from news.dotsrc.org (HELO a.mx.sunsite.dk) (130.225.247.88) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Mar 2008 13:10:07 -0000 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at sunsite.dk does not designate permitted sender hosts) Received: (qmail 34510 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2008 13:10:02 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by a.mx.sunsite.dk with SMTP; 6 Mar 2008 13:10:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 1000 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2008 13:09:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 24692 Received: (qmail 986 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2008 13:09:59 -0000 Received: from bifrost.dotsrc.org (130.225.254.106) by sunsite.dk with SMTP; 6 Mar 2008 13:09:59 -0000 Received: from newman.lshift.net (host226.lshift.net [195.172.218.226]) by bifrost.dotsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52A4802A5EE for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 14:09:55 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 23387 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2008 13:09:55 -0000 Received: from mrgreedy.lshift.net (HELO [10.224.189.100]) ([10.224.189.100]) (envelope-sender ) by newman.lshift.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Mar 2008 13:09:55 -0000 Message-ID: <47CFECFB.7040702@lshift.net> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:09:15 +0000 From: Adrien Pierard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: [Bug] make, zsh and functions References: <47CFE8E3.6090005@lshift.net> In-Reply-To: <47CFE8E3.6090005@lshift.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6151/Thu Mar 6 13:09:17 2008 on bifrost X-Virus-Status: Clean Adrien Pierard wrote: > This is a bug that is easy to reproduce: Ha, I've just been told that it isn't a bug, rather a feature, and that it declared *two* functions, make and foo. I personally think that this is a *very* bad design choice, but anyway, I could revert it easily with "unfunction make", as ft told me on IRC. Cheers, Adrien.