From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-32738-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 7172 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2014 18:48:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 32738
Received: (qmail 23855 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2014 18:47:56 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=SW1qZ580vIgHM9QPs/JLuWZQQG54GMia/prJ4pVdato=;
        b=HZTxsQGLSDwU2HhlOArKolEeTy6V9u7bBH+Nj6Fl+Jv7/rYeql1A1Ge5Z4Ntl6O806
         SvUdRWoegEQw+SPON51ZUV5qf+BwNl1rJ+MpjGx7v61avI2wZ1JGSVBn3NTvhmKqgzFW
         NpCaBpMroEK6rHvcCzZsG4hanOHC3WyOUb7+9fWjsLH0R+DUI/jFb/D7bW6onkel3Dmd
         JnE4a5mhtRstrEbJMYxAJL7/OVeF9OQrRifobYRIXQTeZocgTfO9TiZF0yW8aQusi7fM
         BI666i/pCtXtBCkDHwyIPWeh3hnj1Cw7GtJr6j0XFeDHeFBcBxZmmY934kFv33RsFaS4
         c+gw==
X-Received: by 10.14.246.68 with SMTP id p44mr2381771eer.8.1402166874086;
        Sat, 07 Jun 2014 11:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Nikolas Garofil <nikolas.garofil@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53935E57.3020704@garofil.be>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 20:47:51 +0200
From: Nikolas Garofil <nikolas@garofil.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: patches for 6 different (but related) problems
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The patches I submitted solve 6 different problems that all break the 
building of zsh in specific cases.
I would certainly suggest using my 5th patch because this also fixes the 
problem of an incorrect build in some cases:
The returnvalue of memcpy is used a couple of times but if autoconf 
can't find memcpy and memmove then memcpy get's defined as memmove and 
(without the patch) memmove gets defined as a macro using bcopy that 
doesn't provide this return value. Some (admittedly strange) compilers 
will still compile this and return a random value.