From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33609-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 6267 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2014 16:10:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33609
Received: (qmail 25870 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2014 16:10:38 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=HYUtEE08 c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=WaDuc+ZEBMlF3jy0Tbv8PA==:117 a=WaDuc+ZEBMlF3jy0Tbv8PA==:17 a=G8GL833Es-AA:10
 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=20KFwNOVAAAA:8 a=kqxKaYp8o0TDlw0cBjAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
 a=2keZdwU2pwcA:10
Message-id: <545BAC56.1050804@eastlink.ca>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:13:58 -0800
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Zsh bugfixes released by RedHat
References: <141106075609.ZM3709@torch.brasslantern.com>
In-reply-to: <141106075609.ZM3709@torch.brasslantern.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 11/06/2014 07:56 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1806.html
>
> Anybody know if these are new patches invented by RedHat,
> or something they selectively picked up from our git?
>
> I don't immediately recognize the descriptions in the errata.
>
Do people ever tinker with zsh on any level above the personal and not
coordinate it with you guys?  Wouldn't that end up creating quite a mess?
Shouldn't they at least offer a patch to you so that it might become
official everywhere?  It seems both rude and irresponsible. Or is that
sort of thing considered normal?