From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33772-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 15040 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2014 16:22:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33772
Received: (qmail 17431 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2014 16:22:26 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=AduIQRnG c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=C9Cyx9Rn1FN0NaIcrLGgEg==:117 a=C9Cyx9Rn1FN0NaIcrLGgEg==:17 a=G8GL833Es-AA:10
 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=8pif782wAAAA:8 a=0YswSv5AsXrfE9el0nkA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
Message-id: <547209BD.4070605@eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 08:22:21 -0800
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0
To: =?windows-1252?Q?Lawrence_Vel=E1zquez?= <larryv@macports.org>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: trouble with debugging binary
References: <930.1416260160@thecus.kiddle.eu>
 <42F4E5F2-97E7-4803-87CB-B1C67CD943B2@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
 <15511.1416528068@thecus.kiddle.eu> <546E9224.7090709@eastlink.ca>
 <CAHYJk3Tca_aAn5mjtGb24DDeor28Jk+M9aBYLQhC__Y5-BubUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <546EA58F.7010101@eastlink.ca> <141120222353.ZM10495@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <546F7646.7080108@eastlink.ca> <141121204545.ZM11623@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <141121214351.ZM12585@torch.brasslantern.com> <5470BE8D.5030009@eastlink.ca>
 <089E69C3-7394-4EB6-A321-D542D881C60E@macports.org>
In-reply-to: <089E69C3-7394-4EB6-A321-D542D881C60E@macports.org>

On 11/22/2014 11:58 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca> wrote:
Lawrence,

 >    The "unified" format is quite common. I personally have a hard 
time reading diffs in other formats. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff_utility#Unified_format vq

Thanks, that is very informative.  I never looked at the switches for 
'diff'.  So this means that we can patch the output from 'git diff' then 
so long as we have the whole file?  It will be interesting to see, at 
the next 'pull' if git recognizes the patch or complains.