From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9953 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2014 20:59:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33874 Received: (qmail 5255 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2014 20:59:43 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=AduIQRnG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=grGIsUp3ekU5b/RmSURr+A==:117 a=grGIsUp3ekU5b/RmSURr+A==:17 a=G8GL833Es-AA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=rgWEleGMSoiSg971RpUA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=F42UsJ_QGqAA:10 a=H3gS-PqBCeYA:10 a=UGDB0uZhQiwA:10 Message-id: <548215B2.50108@eastlink.ca> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 12:29:38 -0800 From: Ray Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: vi mode question. References: <17052.1417717710@thecus.kiddle.eu> <141204231735.ZM9532@torch.brasslantern.com> <21098.1417785962@thecus.kiddle.eu> <5481EF6D.4060800@eastlink.ca> In-reply-to: On 12/05/2014 10:55 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: All, > Edit the command in a way that one is comfortable with? Not everyone > likes Emacs keybindings. Alright then, vi command mode at the command line is actively used. As I mentioned, I had wondered if this was some sort of modification of what happened inside vi itself. Or perhaps some editing feature that I don't know about. Whatever folks like of course.