From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-33877-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 8565 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2014 00:32:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 33877
Received: (qmail 26227 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2014 00:32:56 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=AduIQRnG c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=XHB3zmrM/rkVa1DH3N72YA==:117 a=XHB3zmrM/rkVa1DH3N72YA==:17 a=G8GL833Es-AA:10
 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-AGvz5kaapv1im5ZCqAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=EM9TE62tNIYA:10
 a=GKObNQChNj0A:10 a=w5grAjqLKDUA:10
Message-id: <54824EB5.3080001@eastlink.ca>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:32:53 -0800
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Interrupting globs (Re: Something rotten in tar completion)
References: <20141202155452.647182b4@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <141202084858.ZM31517@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20141202172654.30e7d380@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <141204085606.ZM9146@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20141204171226.301e9d2c@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <141205002023.ZM19736@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20141205145054.655a2f70@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <141205100632.ZM508@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20141205181330.2b458b46@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20141205203417.2bc66b7b@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
 <20141205220717.2f86bdd2@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
In-reply-to: <20141205220717.2f86bdd2@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 12/05/2014 02:07 PM, Peter Stephenson wrote:
>
>> continue to do its job of acting as a sandbox but without screwing up
>>
What is a sandbox?

So there was no distinction between an internal error and a user break?
I thought the philosophy was to go overboard making very fine
distinctions between various breaks, and that would seem to be
the very first one to make.