From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16290 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2014 18:44:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 34038 Received: (qmail 26814 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2014 18:44:09 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=T/C1EZ6Q c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=LqNf+c6vAAr0tB+xDTncvA==:117 a=LqNf+c6vAAr0tB+xDTncvA==:17 a=Hpgzp-inWqAA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=A66q08aV51QPyFtlWPAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=UggITvZzy3wA:10 a=32ihe1EM-ZAA:10 a=r1V3G-lacQIA:10 Message-id: <54986675.5030502@eastlink.ca> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 10:44:05 -0800 From: Ray Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: In Vi mode, show whether "insert" or "command" state is active References: <141221175723.ZM5756@torch.brasslantern.com> <20141222182509.3631df05@ntlworld.com> In-reply-to: <20141222182509.3631df05@ntlworld.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 12/22/2014 10:25 AM, Peter Stephenson wrote: > It can't be beyond the wit of person to make it easy to turn on when > it does work, and it should be possible internally to make it much > more convenient to use the terminal handling mechanisms than is > possible in a function. pws Right. Should the shell even attempt to do something that it can't do reliably, or that is not naturally it's business?