From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-34084-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 27966 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2015 19:08:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 34084
Received: (qmail 27163 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2015 19:07:50 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Boundary_(ID_SWJTq9pJCh/Sl3YaqI7vmA)"
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=X+5rdgje c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=+SwvCgffRUjIJVDq/BIVHQ==:117 a=+SwvCgffRUjIJVDq/BIVHQ==:17 a=Hpgzp-inWqAA:10
 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=9iDbn-4jx3cA:10 a=cKsnjEOsciEA:10 a=gZbpxnkM3yUA:10
 a=oQ4kG38_slQshyV010oA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=f0dWbMH8uToA:10 a=_ZXyLQIu1KUA:10
 a=3RYoJZPG9KYA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=f7pZRKid7NeuvlHGkNUA:9
 a=_1_WFf8Hk2QZ6A7B:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10
Message-id: <54A836F9.7060105@eastlink.ca>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 10:37:45 -0800
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?xLBzbWFpbCBEw7ZubWV6?= <ismail@donmez.ws>
Cc: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: A05execution.ztst fails on Cygwin
References:
 <CAJ1KOAgr5uUo9P1HfYYuDxanuhR8=eK5phdDJOrZzY-_vOLwQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <54A82530.6010802@eastlink.ca>
 <CAJ1KOAjZYmaxow78N3acWMv__1NQXx7ZHZd+WMZgr-iJBQzGEQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to:
 <CAJ1KOAjZYmaxow78N3acWMv__1NQXx7ZHZd+WMZgr-iJBQzGEQ@mail.gmail.com>

--Boundary_(ID_SWJTq9pJCh/Sl3YaqI7vmA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT

On 01/03/2015 09:45 AM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
>
>
>
> Well Cygwin is not Linux so thats understandable.
>
Sure, but you never know, it might have been a broader problem.  Maybe 
it's good to also report what is working fine.  Or maybe that's not 
considered necessary.

--Boundary_(ID_SWJTq9pJCh/Sl3YaqI7vmA)--