From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35097-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 988 invoked by alias); 13 May 2015 12:44:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35097
Received: (qmail 461 invoked from network); 13 May 2015 12:44:51 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=thequod.de; h=
	content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to
	:references:subject:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from
	:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=postfix2; t=
	1431521089; bh=amg/XtEicobXkuCygIznipgwhKABIpUZPRVA+OOmF7c=; b=n
	iufhmZDGHfZPuKNoX6Vw+kP3U043OCXrBHN3ADVXkpH5sOPiSh2I3KDqMYHis740
	Jvd42oz3TaH7ByyLCsBSNs4nguQaHk4HWLNSISn+JFj6X7YTrTkAyoiziD/hZgNk
	BUCLg3QDmcXSbl2iiYT8kjqeJ72oP3l+9OCW6b2yHA=
Message-ID: <55534741.9000003@thequod.de>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:44:49 +0200
From: Daniel Hahler <genml+zsh-workers@thequod.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Zsh Hackers' List <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Subject: Re: completion: git: --fixup: problem with _describe -2V and duplicate
 commit subjects
References: <20150329054753.GA2766@tarsus.local2>
In-Reply-To: <20150329054753.GA2766@tarsus.local2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 29.03.2015 07:47, Daniel Shahaf wrote:

> We can of course add the date still, as you suggested; I just think if
> we add the date it should be because the date is useful, not because it
> uniquifies, since adding the hash is a better uniquifier.

I still like the date idea, especially for the recent commits.

I think using "%cr" for the relative committer date, after the subject is good.
It would not make it unique, but only add information.

I think for uniqueness, the "HEAD~15" gitrevisions(7) identifier would be useful
(instead of the hash).

I will post some patch(es) later in this regard.


Regards,
Daniel.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFVU0dAfAK/hT/mPgARAuG3AKCPP/naiQiqWxXbyrzQWh2jPKr8ewCgtTIi
WBInG/ASy3DqR0Jfir6Ru8o=
=rCF5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----