From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35432-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 7729 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2015 10:08:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35432
Received: (qmail 7687 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2015 10:08:43 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Message-ID: <557806F9.80201@thregr.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:44:25 +0200
From: Yuri D'Elia <wavexx@thregr.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: bracketed paste mode in xterm and urxvt
References: <BANLkTikh_-+L2W5=Yfu7h7iAe5CcpP6fxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFOazAOfk=Sq-smkMGzJKO4b7jMb_1_m4vXXn8twoVA2wV55YA@mail.gmail.com> <55677AF5.50709@thequod.de> <mk9dc0$p0$1@ger.gmane.org> <27004.1433345491@thecus.kiddle.eu> <mkrus3$kdi$1@ger.gmane.org> <3098.1433511607@thecus.kiddle.eu> <mksc2m$n3q$1@ger.gmane.org> <7701.1433896116@thecus.kiddle.eu>
In-Reply-To: <7701.1433896116@thecus.kiddle.eu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 06/10/2015 02:28 AM, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> On 5 Jun, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
>> What if the terminal itself turns off BREAK processing during paste?
>
> You can try. Would be interesting. May not work when there is ssh/sshd,
> telnet, screen, tmux etc sat between urxvt and zsh.

I will give it a try. Doesn't sound complicated to implement (easier
than read ssh source code anyway..).

>>From reading termios(8) though, if we disable BREAK a \0 is emitted in
his place.

>> Putty also eats it by the way. If that's the case for all terminals, I
>> would just enabled it by default.
> 
> We can always add some tests later if it appears to be necessary. Any
> objections?
> I've tried quite hard to find a terminal that won't eat the sequence and
> found none.

I have an old SGI Octane sitting somewhere, with IRIX 6.5... but do we
really want to support it ? ;)

I would say it's really better if this was enabled by default and see if
there's any report coming in.