From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-35538-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 23128 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2015 21:16:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 35538
Received: (qmail 28869 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2015 21:16:23 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Subject: Re: Typeset with array
To: zsh-workers@zsh.org
References: <5578996E.3080700@thequod.de>
 <150610191427.ZM30841@torch.brasslantern.com> <5579C247.1060800@thequod.de>
 <150611183639.ZM32247@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <20150612094237.338f79d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20150619123930.2688d9e3@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <20150619150624.3368cd00@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
 <150619115454.ZM4290@torch.brasslantern.com>
From: Eric Cook <llua@gmx.com>
Message-ID: <55848564.30702@gmx.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:11:00 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <150619115454.ZM4290@torch.brasslantern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID:  V03:K0:S+clG4HcnzaXt03eRlxJh7Gnr1k/I6yCUUKsuBJxJ9+qyLNQgP+
 yngjPnWvVg8OM2GjDUKg/ZzRIuSgHEz1VpCT142xeMj/YSesrNRTnESWi6JAVege/+tEkoH
 0GwdVE0fs0UaBB8J++g9jykIAEJ6/tHH/5ZSaTRvdja8uuS6ddnp26hJKhXIXPs9zKgHWVR
 vV8h7NkZfowrxVoke8Ceg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:fc7gFGrrwBE=:q9TNPYx4+77IFUVYFwpF0L
 z1MpXPDps9XdlEdZt9TxOcLnmQvKQawy6n4Xumv24ZEAB2KHHk6MCZPwYIllDHkgVhBiJ6G1E
 w9l7JEUGCj/siwQcAdAnSaY1GiurzXXwubzdEDIuX5g/tNaAJoHtx6amYALjYIOAvdcSft0LZ
 wjuGo9kn9bO7OuPTfjUk9yPzwF/mVQ2hER9luZI8O8pPTeUp9McDQkOq4p8VkkNxtV7YIr2Hl
 VvbOf2c5NjQOhDqwEXlT3YWP5emyeFuoOgUDio8fkRn9waEw2P5nBUYonECWRbgmSt7haANHz
 x4mv7fYlCa8WH8UbeA3vDthxMKerU1AuBao6xU4rMQhTtjnC8p2tbzz7Z0Yld0+WYGSirqL0V
 Go4J+3EXfOb9Hbz+WJ5YxW/a6GTCTOqP6Sl61pcDGp7idCMiLHh5t4y09KUCsWnYahQfU39+o
 mZ2fA/2wxvJ0noJAA79cI7xCkQLCVNPZg3l7eLbDHBjOS3/h5B6OrPEEvcORPRE2S7bn8ICv6
 YJbT5mjRThj8EVW63UzQPVV+iY5P+hzwOEv1lDgK+xY1OQIXwLaAFAS0xBOZcXX1mVKMlsGEw
 ha9io309GT4OR48/n+GuT3Lfm7z0BHYlM0cujevUPkH943d2fcVt+A7P8Fkb3RWUmbeHeG16L
 lT3UqkrYsBSqIr8bmlxrCpO7dj8D1brPxVDUw7QY9ddtcOwIrmLYFgLqnPVMaY7HQMjI=

On 06/19/2015 02:54 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> Does this raise a larger question of whether the reserved word should be
> enabled by default in "zsh mode"?
>
>
I personally like the consistency of builtin commands being parsed like
normal commands.
weird stuff like:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2014-12/msg00028.html
Don't happen that way.