From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5676 invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2016 22:28:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 38051 Received: (qmail 12033 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2016 22:28:24 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Message-ID: <56D4C5FC.6000903@inlv.org> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:28:12 +0100 From: Martijn Dekker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zsh-workers@zsh.org CC: Peter Stephenson Subject: Re: Why zsh chose to be non-compliant in pattern matching References: <20160229102741.6c1d5518@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> In-Reply-To: <20160229102741.6c1d5518@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Peter Stephenson schreef op 29-02-16 om 11:27: > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 17:00:28 +0700 > Cuong Manh Le wrote: >> The super user in U&L site post his opinion at >> http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/266394/38906 >> >> He said that the pattern matching spec is unspecified for quoted characters >> inside bracket expression. What is your opinion? > > He's talking about the standard, which indeed doesn't say anything about > the subject. In my view, the standard is quite clear: "If any character (ordinary, shell special, or pattern special) is quoted, that pattern shall match the character itself." That sentence applies to pattern matching notation as a whole. Bracket expressions are a part of pattern matching notation. There is no language anywhere in the standard that excludes bracket expressions from the sentence quoted. http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_13 Thanks, - M.