> On 7 May 2022, at 07:24, dana <dana@dana.is> wrote:
> 
> On Fri 6 May 2022, at 21:57, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>> Any objections to this sneaking into 5.9, despite .3-test already spun?
> 
> I don't know anything about Gradle, so i'm not sure if the way it handles
> task completion is desirable.

The old task completion logic was too strict: There were many real-world task names that it did not complete. Also, the logic was actually incorrect: There were some forms of names that it did not allow, but which are explicitly allowed in Gradle’s spec.

> But i didn't see anything obviously wrong
> with the patch, and it's not a critical component, so i don't object in
> principle

Great! :)

> I did note these pre-existing issues which might be fixed in a future
> revision:

Yes, I noticed these, too. I will have a look at fixings them sometime in a future patch.