From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16710 invoked from network); 17 Feb 1997 18:22:17 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 Feb 1997 18:22:17 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA19829; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 13:06:38 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 13:06:38 -0500 (EST) From: Zefram Message-Id: <5704.199702171808@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Subject: Re: zsh-3.1.1 on NetBSD patch & problems To: gwing@primenet.com.au Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 18:08:13 +0000 (GMT) Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <19970217064928.14467.qmail@primenet.com.au> from "gwing@primenet.com.au" at Feb 17, 97 05:49:28 pm X-Loop: zefram@dcs.warwick.ac.uk X-Stardate: [-31]8898.77 X-US-Congress: Moronic fuckers X-Personality: INTJ Content-Type: text Resent-Message-ID: <"39bAI2.0.jr4.ju92p"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2902 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu gwing@primenet.com.au wrote: >1) What's happened to default compctls? Who cares? They were a bad idea anyway. >3) why is -pedantic set for --enable-debug ? So we don't accidentally introduce non-conformant code that gcc accepts. -zefram