From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6425 invoked by alias); 12 May 2016 13:02:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 38478 Received: (qmail 22243 invoked from network); 12 May 2016 13:02:31 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MVQHKVFdTbsq+HU9kLh0f4B8/e+uUlKpXujBaZNskxc=; b=mZZX00mYGdpXkXWNvvgrqz9vo2hHKdl7FZIR4ByI+9kdJ8IzdOHjGfsJMEwF7WKQIT M+DwOEVsbMUUfI6W5DHzB/orWpiRqsdaNcE1bUI44n/clItbYDzTK7fhdZq5NKdSZrmd WHBHHX1gQAZ+NYStZ1xCFjbpHsX1kVVrIY/MXzlU58Mz0tkTvrS96updfqe9zCNYYmOE BeGSqTbn6nCzaSZW7uqkcP+d1uTCVpXtc/BgzMRapIQFy1T4u5gd49sGO4jTg5qKIj6I /LpHSv+dzv4yKXiBhcm+Ynf9p/91D4SsVfwF1uIteiYEwHpTGKhzGFu6HXM5IXiVcVmJ 5YxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWMUzjQqTbMUwqqxafHrj0qSKG4H4x7aGJLHVrH2JEs6+0PWPr0yFm+Zf/QlZaxkxNG X-Received: by 10.28.211.10 with SMTP id k10mr6228112wmg.82.1463058149359; Thu, 12 May 2016 06:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: Marko Myllynen Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsh x font family completion References: <57308891.6070906@redhat.com> <18888.1462978905@thecus.kiddle.eu> To: Oliver Kiddle Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org From: Marko Myllynen Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: <57347EE2.70909@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 16:02:26 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18888.1462978905@thecus.kiddle.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 2016-05-11 18:01, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > Marko Myllynen wrote: >> >> I'm working on completions for a command which has an option to select >> the font family to use, I was wondering whether X font family >> completions would be worthwhile to add for others to use as well? > > Note that there is an existing _xft_fonts function which does something > close to this. Would it work with the command you're writing a > completion for. It might be better to give it an option to limit it to > completing font families. Or does the command actually allow a size to > be specified. Hmm, not sure I managed to miss _xft_fonts but it does what I want, let's forget this patch. (Although, FWIW, I must say I prefer the format I had chosen over xft_fonts, i.e., lower-cased without spaces, applications seem to accept both.) Thanks, -- Marko Myllynen