From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25047 invoked from network); 8 Mar 1997 12:26:45 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Mar 1997 12:26:45 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA05324; Sat, 8 Mar 1997 07:16:50 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 07:16:50 -0500 (EST) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Path: coral.primenet.com.au!not-for-mail From: mason@primenet.com.au (G C Wing) Newsgroups: zsh.workers Subject: Re: Zle patch - termok change Date: 8 Mar 1997 23:19:00 +1100 Organization: PrimeNet Sender: gwing@coral.primenet.com.au Distribution: local Message-ID: <5frlfk$oc2$1@coral.primenet.com.au> References: <5fpbgb$lsm$1@coral.primenet.com.au> X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 CURRENT #6 Resent-Message-ID: <"POw2D3.0.7J1.oYL8p"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2976 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Zefram writes: :gwing@primenet.com.au wrote: :Yuck. issetflag() evaluates Y twice, and there aren't enough parentheses. Really, give me an non-extremely convoluted example where my macros would fail. :But why bother with these macros anyway? We've always been happy with :the (much clearer) plain bit operations anyway. Fine. Zoltan's removed them anyway with his replacement patch. Zoltan wrote: :begin 600 termok-patch.gz BTW, termok-patch.gz gunzips to a file ``f'', unless you turn original names off. Also, the line oxtabs = (SGTTYFLAG & SGTABTYPE); needs to be changed to oxtabs = ((SGTTYFLAG & SGTABTYPE) == SGTABTYPE); There is absolutely no guarantee that SGTABTYPE contains unique bits. On my machine it's 0xc00 -- Geoff Wing [mason@primenet.com.au] Technical Manager Phone : +61-3-9818 2977 PrimeNet - Internet Consultancy Facsimile: +61-3-9819 3788 Web : Mobile : 0412 162 441