From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1cbfb4c2 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14188 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2020 14:59:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 45513 Received: (qmail 28242 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Mar 2020 14:59:39 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.102.2/25738. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(64.147.123.21):SA:0(-2.6/5.0):. Processed in 5.569663 secs); 05 Mar 2020 14:59:39 -0000 X-Envelope-From: d.s@daniel.shahaf.name X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at daniel.shahaf.name does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedruddutddgjeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfffgrnhhivghlucfuhhgrhhgrfhdfuceougdrshesuggr nhhivghlrdhshhgrhhgrfhdrnhgrmhgvqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegurdhssegurghnihgvlhdrshhhrghhrghfrdhnrghm vg X-ME-Proxy: X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-988-g326a76f-fmstable-20200305v1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <6983fea4-e9d2-40fc-8546-98b39d1dfdf4@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <82F8CDE0-C95C-4D31-ABFC-EBB3C97799F3@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <1B509B1C-A670-482F-9D88-2145E15D03A1@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <20200109131553.hqetnd45sc43z6xb@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <087AE8B9-35B0-4258-9626-AACA85471A07@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <20200111201549.GA1264@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <3340070A-53DD-40F0-8363-A8C7D84702D3@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <374cecf6-45d5-4688-861f-cc52017dbcea@www.fastmail.com> <321F9465-ABF9-465D-9242-7EF9A0EDDBED@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <20200227132229.3e290918@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <84E062E9-E44F-4123-AC41-12E12071924E@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <20200228141935.0b2d9748@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> <939538FA-A90B-44DA-AF85-C50D0F516BA0@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:58:35 +0000 From: "Daniel Shahaf" To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] find RLIM_NLIMITS correctly on Cygwin Content-Type: text/plain Jun T wrote on Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:26 +00:00: > > 2020/03/05 4:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > >> Test/B01cd.ztst | 7 +++++-- > >> Test/B12limit.ztst | 10 ++++++++++ > >> Test/ztst.zsh | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > >> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > I reviewed the diff (without out-of-hunk contexts) and have no comments. > > How about the patch for rlimit.c? > If it's OK (other than the constness and name of the structure) I will push > them soon. Sure, go ahead. (I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, I'm afraid, but I don't see that as a blocker.) Cheers, Daniel