From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3236 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2010 18:18:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27838 Received: (qmail 17061 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2010 18:18:14 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.221.173 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HZDdP4aurX+7E9iWt9V9Tv/i45Aa6pvY1iPX+I/1iX8=; b=dbyhyM8vxzV0Bbhz8pD4mRon3eT2oR21ORzdHwHvyXcJCcGrJNlLeuBLOe+1ezOtvi N5XEKvhw60htirnR7Eyc3gQA2k8QX/vwCCm6T+R/kR1a75tNZcCN5Ak+c7beUa0yeLiq YWDbz55Bxeji8iB30VVLZSiQfe04mKAs/i9Hg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=MTZRtb4nLdluCNjt2RqzXcZgpMjsFpS4CP84xgAJz1cuBTKhegjZs/GDoKW1B2Fbrg KsJTscQoL1OGlUWma1IrNi1qbAu/8XgpUZzgRuRKXaads/vrnfGOvttJ3BW5EIbD0AZj 1luhWCxHJ8S/vHo9ewl03R0spvyZKzB2egNgo= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <100326203425.ZM29478@torch.brasslantern.com> <733654e31003270902s7076ef9dxdc17e0ea6e59b987@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:18:08 -0700 Message-ID: <733654e31003271118k1b33cb7fx9ec5de3d7249fa96@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: SourceForge CVS down for the weekend, it looks like From: Wayne Davison <4wayned@gmail.com> To: "Benjamin R. Haskell" Cc: Zsh Workers Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023544714c04c85a50482cc4d22 --0023544714c04c85a50482cc4d22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > if the SF git server were to go down, how is it any different than the SF > CVS server going down? There are multiple git servers, all of which share the load for serving every git request, no matter the project. CVS doesn't play well with shared storage, so there is just one cvs server for a particular project that is active at any one time. This means that there are outages for maintenance, outages for fail-overs, etc., more-so than there'd be with git. ..wayne.. --0023544714c04c85a50482cc4d22--