From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-31458-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 27049 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2013 08:18:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 31458
Received: (qmail 23615 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2013 08:18:13 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at spf01.biglobe.ne.jp designates 133.205.19.69 as permitted sender)
X-Biglobe-Sender: <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: Another yodl 3.0 oddity?
From: "Jun T." <takimoto-j@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <130603230130.ZM16166@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 16:19:29 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <74765498-998F-4461-B170-FFB57E1B354F@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
References: <130603230130.ZM16166@torch.brasslantern.com>
To: "zsh-workers@zsh.org" <zsh-workers@zsh.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)

On 2013/06/04, at 15:01, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
>          number the directories in the stack when printing.
> 
> []
> 
> disable [ -afmprs ] NAME ...


Please try using WIDER terminal window so that info browser can
display whole of the status line (the bottom line of the info browser);
yes, this may sound nonsense, but just give it a try.

I guess the index now brings you to one line (not two lines) above the
'disable ...' line (this may be a bug of the info browser).

Next try deleting an extra blank line (line 289) in builtin.yo:

enditem()
          --- this line
)
findex(disable)

and 'make info' again. Now I *hope* the index will bring you to the
correct line (if the width of your terminal is wide enough).


> This in turn seems to be happening because yodl has been
> invoked with the -k flag,

zsh.texi produced by yodl with and without the '-k' option are identical:

$ yodl --version
yodl version 3.00.0
$ yodl -k -L -o zsh.texi -I. -w ztexi.yo version.yo zsh.yo
$ yodl -L -o zsh2.texi -I. -w ztexi.yo version.yo zsh.yo
$ cmp zsh.texi zsh2.texi
(no output)


Jun