From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 6539 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2022 03:32:39 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 11 Dec 2022 03:32:39 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Mime-Version:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=zcDGELamOekT3gOsqnfw8rIJZPwozIuqeqpCTRPEhBY=; b=C+P2fdy1wHmwzL2j916cvuMYdU baYBtDBEopOc/OmMUQSyzgtGkkGy5Xiv4SRS72i8YG4Je3UsP2+ZQmuU1+VQ+Y46MjDpC8OKapTE2 L4gUk40qm4xa9RwxRiu7dkER8YxRxO7sVdD82yDGUQx9lNq+Ey6WLwWzskC6qvsbVuuIofzOm6YHd gdr6+VX3hp06WxH8y4gNi/Ew3dVq7gJbU62kS13MQcOkeDVRGT9GhA+JG0AtuD3TPyJja9GzxKxKo vgT7eFZwoZa1nrzXm0+iLaocekFQ2Y0ltsd/klBtiuOvmI5zTAMa80HsHX641842s1Nw8IXNjF31t peTjqPUg==; Received: by zero.zsh.org with local id 1p4D4w-0002sr-N8; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 03:32:38 +0000 Received: by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1p4D4f-0002Zd-My; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 03:32:21 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F44727C0054; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 22:32:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap48 ([10.202.2.98]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 10 Dec 2022 22:32:20 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdehgdeiudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvvefutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepnfgrfihr vghntggvucggvghljoiiqhhuvgiiuceolhgrrhhrhihvseiishhhrdhorhhgqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeelkeehjefgudefgeekueegudeghfevvdeljeehieeuffehveejgfeh tefhudevhfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehlrghrrhihvhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqudduhedu keejjedtgedqudduledvjeefkeehqdhlrghrrhihvheppeiishhhrdhorhhgsehfrghsth hmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iaa214773:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6206331A0063; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 22:32:20 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1115-g8b801eadce-fm-20221102.001-g8b801ead Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <79df64ce-17e7-45e8-833f-f975c97f7797@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <46fcb939-0ed9-4b51-959d-67339181e3e3@app.fastmail.com> <20221210113214.GV27622@tarpaulin.shahaf.local2> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 22:32:00 -0500 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= To: "Philippe Altherr" , "Daniel Shahaf" Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] NEWS item about the ERR_EXIT fixes Content-Type: text/plain X-Seq: 51184 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: On Sat, Dec 10, 2022, at 8:49 AM, Philippe Altherr wrote: > Afaik, Zsh intends to be compatible with the POSIX "set -e" > specification On what are you basing this assertion? > If that is indeed the case, then all the patches can be seen as bug > fixes. I don't agree. The documentation barely says anything about any of the behaviors you modified, and zsh is not a POSIX-compatible shell, so it's entirely reasonable for users to have accepted the previous behavior as intentional. > So no Zsh doc changes are required (or at least not because of > these patches). This is only incidentally true. The documentation omits many details about ERR_EXIT's special cases, so your changes largely fall between the lines (so to speak). -- vq