From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9744 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2021 20:08:48 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 Apr 2021 20:08:48 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20200801; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Message-ID:Date:Content-ID: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From:In-reply-to:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=r6rXkO1i4BgidvFdeo01SWdsYYnHtqaYE9i60x1+DB0=; b=IQWlPmzc78i+ZJQ3tOGrvUsw8v ezgk/aknnwot4T8ttUWT0tKNaytIxhqoHG1gzud016uVOaMl1eqlZ9pS5hKyPyZVx8R4HWKRvR5T9 cIdwtK5GphtuscKOvnrS0hgRQGjs/m+QTN5K3QRL9jGPdAWJOfmjOOHP4l7dWVV/EfbdwGnO8DZRL xmyOtMW9Fm04VxddTyY1qq2DL31w/f0hWJLZxKcxPMuBhIpJK3qrTOT/P0Dps7+eOYizNOMmSzA6y SrJIuasy1SYD2k9lpM9YtS28NNo9grD9DFzQzfPp1idyxoBgivcR543+0RIT1wFPZaD6MLvHYAR6Z tAFA4XzQ==; Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with local id 1lUxQu-0009Ei-Kq; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 20:08:48 +0000 Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1lUxQi-0008yo-Cd; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 20:08:36 +0000 Received: from [192.168.178.21] (helo=hydra) by mail.kiddle.eu with esmtp(Exim 4.93.0.4) (envelope-from ) id 1lUxQi-000LV6-1l for zsh-workers@zsh.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 22:08:36 +0200 In-reply-to: <6C8E81D3-E859-4C65-97D0-90E614816619@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> From: Oliver Kiddle References: <20201231054131.682544-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20201231054131.682544-4-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <8940db24-8c70-45a6-8d3b-71047c1ce3b5@www.fastmail.com> <8638a7d8-418c-4065-be5d-21d42d693c56@www.fastmail.com> <57530-1617921898.773095@9HdU.NV4Y.7xMR> <6C8E81D3-E859-4C65-97D0-90E614816619@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] autoconf: prepare for 2.70 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <82650.1617998916.1@hydra> Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 22:08:36 +0200 Message-ID: <82651-1617998916.051731@a6Dr.Jrvx.lcPg> X-Seq: 48447 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Jun T wrote: > I also tested on a few systems and fund no problems. Good. I've now applied them. > I think mem.c can be further simplified as follows (discard unnecessary macros): Yes, that does simplify it somewhat. No objections from me. But I'll leave you to commit it. > Are there any systems that still require --enable-zsh-mem? I don't think I ever have needed it especially. I don't know if anyone perhaps finds it useful for debug capabilities though some of the common malloc implementations probably have better functionality for that anyway. Cutting away some of this old stuff from the zsh code base may make it easier to maintain. So again, no objections from me but in this case there may be others with an interest in keeping it. Oliver