From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from zero.zsh.org (zero.zsh.org [IPv6:2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C08C29736 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 23:18:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:To:References: Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:From: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=IQlaavCfp8oDVXnXgauduGCz0s+hmiu0hUAGFyrGsLM=; b=I/TqYEa8rA5bvz9GfUL8rW8xtq iybOxQevtwL6TLi+LVk+CntjxSVMzsgZFFG7kXRKuyREWAPdXJ0GB/f9mtwiczTHWbEtQ2wg1zyf5 93x4SnmvGkXh4ma0vrcdzjvIxxq5Nz/d4oAumEYQqzDbCGayZdm/Trnqjc2YYIey8Zw9/tePWieHg EaZ4krZP9ql7EJ9LZcSiYL4Rtik5NK0x88oknnG+EvfOYQuVSYsjUkCKMFtiWRzpfpUIRx7IsbAXG iysp/I4NZCb7LtmVOTOf8IsuC8I64anVpbipszCwxPb/8u6Uls1i/uwuI/0QpdA/8x9P0RuACH340 qxDz9nXQ==; Received: by zero.zsh.org with local id 1sQvkq-0000kU-Mr; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 21:18:36 +0000 Received: by zero.zsh.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1sQvkB-0000PJ-Gd; Mon, 08 Jul 2024 21:17:56 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AE31200043 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:17:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Jul 2024 17:17:53 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdejgdduheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhtgfgggfuffhfvfgjkffosehtqh hmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnrgifrhgvnhgtvgcugggvlhojiihquhgviicuoehlrghr rhihvhesiihshhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieeuteduudeugfdvgfduge fgtdffteevteehgeevlefftddutdefvefhtdfhteejnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhu sgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehlrghrrhihvhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlihhthidqudduhedu keejjedtgedqudduledvjeefkeehqdhlrghrrhihvheppeiishhhrdhorhhgsehfrghsth hmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iaa214773:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:17:52 -0400 (EDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote files completion: remove double-escaping Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:17:51 -0400 References: To: zsh-workers@zsh.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <863E0019-2AFF-4CD2-AF2B-A80499908D95@zsh.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) X-Seq: 52988 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: , List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: > On May 28, 2024, at 11:40 AM, Lyn Fugmann wrote: >=20 > I finally got around to testing this. The behavior appears to depend = only on the local version of rsync, not on the remote version. Tested = using local rsync 3.2.3 and 3.2.7, remote rsync 3.1.3 and 3.2.7. So I = think the patch should be fine as is. (I would expect very few people to = run an over two years old version of rsync and a recent version of zsh = on the same local machine.) A GitHub user is inquiring about the status of this contribution. https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh/pull/114#issuecomment-2212591419 --=20 vq=