From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-28477-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 16444 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2010 18:25:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 28477
Received: (qmail 20082 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2010 18:25:33 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references
         :date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
        bh=267e7zaQ46T9L6adkjfhSeaxB1u81SqeRCu1Djzofes=;
        b=sFqgk7yVodTQKNPzVaws0hbsXkzUxG5rJS9f20pvBbG7n58wJqKWMthv9GCaqNcz+k
         rv9s3vVXqdCVyKGgAuO3hBTUD7YNrk2rwPhWaAtJgGHdcLQE0vDDRtDIGHjV15c82RgM
         s3SYZlF+c7NXWJ3Q7RfikCkE1KNVj7oFqTDTU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id:user-agent
         :mime-version:content-type;
        b=ap7jOHyxkTcx3KGhnrt3mR3UqsbBFOn90Kwejn82deAyxHWkO42XHCkSBm3VY4tG//
         zKa2+9bIeR787T/OF2TcwJcOrM1lZ67UA4Vds0aXvGaA2QvG+UlPQs+tUHt6IAPx9h0T
         hD96LpP+BFnZt3DQaqqqArsISvGlgEEKdk1qw=
From: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: time builtin vs. time(1): difference in memory numbers
References: <868w06l3cq.fsf@gmail.com>
	<101204102844.ZM5983@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<86tyisv48o.fsf@gmail.com>
	<101205055913.ZM32440@torch.brasslantern.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:25:15 +0300
Message-ID: <86mxokm60k.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> writes:

> On Dec 5,  2:38pm, Anonymous wrote:
> } Subject: Re: time builtin vs. time(1): difference in memory numbers
> }
> } According to getrusage(2) on BSDs ixrss/idrss/isrss are "expressed in
> } units of kilobytes * ticks-of-execution". So, I've made a quick hack
> } 
> }   http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/152820
>
> Looks like it'd be appropriate to wrap that first hunk in
> #ifdef _SC_CLK_TCK
> ??

Does Linux needs to divide them by ticks, too?

>
> I'm curious if FreeBSD has anything like this (from <asm/param.h>
> on RHEL4):
>
> #define HZ sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK)

No but I'm just an average user. Note, sysconf(_SC_CLK_TCK) returns
CLK_TCK (a constant) defined in <time.h> that may differ from the value
used by getrusage(). [1]

[1] NetBSD does get its value from kern.clockrate sysctl
    and there was a discussion to port it to FreeBSD
      http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020701142849.U6692-100000