From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13352 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2014 16:47:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 33794 Received: (qmail 7612 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2014 16:47:19 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: zsh-workers@zsh.org From: Christian Neukirchen Subject: Re: 0b numeric prefix Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:47:08 +0100 Message-ID: <871tordy7n.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20141125160718.01444ac8@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host57-2.natpool.mwn.de In-Reply-To: <20141125160718.01444ac8@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> (Peter Stephenson's message of "Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:07:18 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) Peter Stephenson writes: > I'm not sure whether to output this form in C_BASES mode. On the one > hand, it's more likely to be understood on input in utilities other than > shells than 2#blah; on the other, it won't work with older versions of > zsh or other shells (not that C_BASES is designed with other shells in > mind). Because of the latter I'm not intending to do this. It would > also be a perversion of the name of the option. C++14 has binary literals afaict. gcc and clang implement it already. -- Christian Neukirchen http://chneukirchen.org