From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28557 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2011 18:48:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 29855 Received: (qmail 19855 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2011 18:48:33 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at bewatermyfriend.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Frank Terbeck To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] better systemctl completion In-Reply-To: <20111024122731.695d91fc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> (Peter Stephenson's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:27:31 +0100") References: <20111024100147.1724c732@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <4EA549D1.2040009@gmail.com> <20111024122731.695d91fc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:45:58 +0200 Message-ID: <871uu2ut21.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Df-Sender: NDMwNDQ0 Peter Stephenson wrote: [...] > Sorry, my mistake. I'll apply the patch. [...] Um. The file got a new licence as GPLv3 ("# This file is released under the GPLv3."). I am obviously not a lawyer, but I know that we requested a dual/relicencing before including an elaborate update for the `_hg' completion function: I've seen that there a few files that mention the GPL in our repository right now: Unix/Command/_darcs, Unix/Command/_osc, openSUSE/Command/_osc, openSUSE/Command/_zypper. I'd like to know what the policy WRT to licences of completion files etc. is and/or if we are allowed to do that (I really have no idea). Regards, Frank