From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-17669-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 8694 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2002 00:58:58 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Sep 2002 00:58:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 9407 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2002 00:58:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 17669
Received: (qmail 9388 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2002 00:58:40 -0000
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk (Zsh hackers list)
Subject: Re: For loop bug
References: <20020913233156.324A31C0E9@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
From: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>
Date: 13 Sep 2002 17:58:34 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20020913233156.324A31C0E9@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk>
Message-ID: <871y7xs7yd.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>

Peter Stephenson <pws@pwstephenson.fsnet.co.uk> writes:

> Philippe Troin wrote:
> > Tried on zsh 4.0.4 and 4.0.6:
> >=20
> >   % for i in 1 2 3; do echo $i || break; done && echo X
> >   1
> >   X
> >   2
> >   X
> >   3
> >   X
> >   X
> >   %=20
> >=20
> > That looks somewhat incorrect...
>=20
> Oh, *yuk*.
>=20
> > Or did I miss something?
>=20
> Non, h=E9las.
>=20
> The wordcode is pretty horrific to debug: it's uncommented and as an
> unstructured array of integers completely opaque to all debugging tools.
> Tentative patch below --- passes all tests, including the new one (which
> Philippe will recognise).  It's actually against 4.1, but I doubt if
> much has changed here.
>=20
> I may leave this till Monday for people to scratch their heads over.

Does it fix this one as well?

  % for i in 1 2 3; do { {echo $i; [[ $i =3D=3D 2 ]] && exit 1; } || break =
}; \
  > done && echo X
  1
  X
  %=20

I would have expected:

  1
  2
  X=20

or=20

  1
  2

But surely not 1 X.

Phil.