From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1665 invoked by alias); 23 May 2013 12:41:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 31428 Received: (qmail 18495 invoked from network); 23 May 2013 12:41:04 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO, SPF_HELO_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: zsh-workers@zsh.org From: Christian Neukirchen Subject: Re: Duplicated file: Completion/{Unix,openSUSE}/Command/_osc Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 14:22:35 +0200 Sender: chris@juno Message-ID: <8738tdlwc4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20130522213755.GE22106@sym.noone.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.245.98.151 In-Reply-To: <20130522213755.GE22106@sym.noone.org> (Axel Beckert's message of "Wed, 22 May 2013 23:37:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Axel Beckert writes: > Hi, > > via http://dedup.debian.net/compare/zsh-common/zsh-common I noticed > that there's a file twice in zsh's source code: > > % md5sum `find . -name _osc` > fbe707e9fde5740de5fa57c0a6cd58bc ./Completion/Unix/Command/_osc > fbe707e9fde5740de5fa57c0a6cd58bc ./Completion/openSUSE/Command/_osc > > I suspect that the openSUSE one can be removed. While we are at it, Completion/openSUSE/Command/_osc Completion/openSUSE/Command/_zypper Completion/Unix/Command/_systemd Completion/Unix/Command/_darcs are GPL2 or GPL3 without explicit mention in LICENCE which may harm people that think they can redistribute zsh (binaries) more freely. (Also compare #25739). I think it would be a good idea to try to relicense them under the same terms as zsh itself. Thanks, -- Christian Neukirchen http://chneukirchen.org