From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12133 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2014 15:05:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 32343 Received: (qmail 22101 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2014 15:04:48 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 From: Greg Klanderman To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: Tests of interrupting completion, and completion_nostat_dirs Reply-to: gak@klanderman.net Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:04:40 -0500 In-reply-to: <140130082206.ZM23682@torch.brasslantern.com> (Bart Schaefer's message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:22:06 -0800") Message-id: <874n4g1blj.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux) References: <140122000435.ZM1516@torch.brasslantern.com> <140123171659.ZM19422@torch.brasslantern.com> <87iot91lp8.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> <140125124934.ZM23767@torch.brasslantern.com> <87eh3q3g63.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> <140129181206.ZM22813@torch.brasslantern.com> <20140130093057.6e04fa53@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <140130082206.ZM23682@torch.brasslantern.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>>>> On January 30, 2014 Bart Schaefer wrote: > Right, but the completion-only scoping could stand in for that in the > case of completion. The "problem" for zle is that, unless we actually > make the internals aware of zstyle values at the C level, there's no > guaranteed entry point where a zstyle can be referenced by shell code. > (zle-line-init could serve that role now, I suppose, but then everyone > needs a default zle-line-init [compare MENUSCROLL above].) Hi Bart and Peter, not sure if you've converged on an appropriate way to configure the nostat dirs, but I'm happy to rework that part to use a zstyle or whatever is best. The way I did it so far was most expedient for my local patch but I agree a zstyle would probably be best, though there is the problem of catching all the entry points to C which can end up calling ztat() as you note.. Greg