From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12080 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2016 15:48:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 38066 Received: (qmail 4486 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2016 15:48:57 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=OCsAQ4P0l6eDZZFHocw4Cc2FFyo=; b=vVYpdIhjsbK7YMskPO e/4UDCKfYAHhIL/Y5a7mkP1eT6EptXn2dmmDrbdwVNl87s0wzT0hqiFTHwlTUDHD 4qza+RKy1BmfawbkGQmiuYmJfdfRIXOFBF/7QfwfE+LeqF+Wy2Im0sx5wO+P7Oif XV2IZYGdJlTtihIf44YIL5y74= From: Greg Klanderman To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: ZSH_SCRIPT Reply-To: Greg Klanderman Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:48:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160302093034.6e9086a2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> (Peter Stephenson's message of "Wed, 02 Mar 2016 09:30:34 +0000") Message-ID: <87a8mg7ued.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux) References: <22221.59800.803540.618862@lwm.klanderman.net> <160224143153.ZM28994@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160225093344.0d2499d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <87r3g08ycp.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> <160225150425.ZM14095@torch.brasslantern.com> <87lh6384y5.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> <20160301092746.1472ae95@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <87fuwa8dpk.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> <20160301150707.2ee18f01@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> <874mcq889m.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> <160301103630.ZM8094@torch.brasslantern.com> <871t7u7y7a.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> <20160302093034.6e9086a2@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SG-EID: i+zOheVB0lMUqP0z3X/8PPLe+C1hDfxH7g5ommK/LCosNl54TWGFulJLdUtt6lMhroNSJ9OyJgPxxU jZ4UUTOTEqU/XNrjAuA3Nm4JPXCXuTYCUxmtZ0z7bMMNhJl2ZrUQShZbhbPot6RkjEc45F2qXWKv11 O/TJk5QlKKCypTnwPKk/VsvICEjfRvKhiMSaHB/1ddxTfx33MjDuBJPbPg7ZRS3Zf0D5MKL+uRwTIP A= >>>>> On March 2, 2016 Peter Stephenson wrote: > No, the new variables come from an argument and these are already > metafied very early on in zsh_main by > for (t = argv; *t; *t = metafy(*t, -1, META_ALLOC), t++); OK, I will change those two back to ztrdup() sans metify. Should I add a comment to that effect? Did you want this ztrdup in or not: zsh_script = ztrdup(runscript); > Look around and you'll see none of the other uses of command line > arguments don't get further metafied, either (including posixzero > which is related to the new ones). > The things that need metafying when turned into variables come from > the environment (including the working directory). It looks like ZSH_NAME comes from argv[0] immediately after the early metification you pointed out above, but is being re-metified here: setsparam("ZSH_NAME", ztrdup_metafy(zsh_name)); Greg